Resource Center

Advanced Search
Technical Papers
Working Papers
Research Memoranda
GTAP-L Mailing List
GTAP FAQs
CGE Books/Articles
Important References
Submit New Resource

GTAP Resources: Resource Display

GTAP Resource #3122

"Methodological shortcomings in estimating Armington elasticities"
by Cassoni, Adriana and Manuel Flores


Abstract
CGEMs are one of the most potentially powerful tools for simulating policies. However, a major restriction they face is them needing a huge number of parameters that are not always available, and even at times impossible to obtain. When CGEMs are applied to trade, Armington elasticities of substitution are one of those key sets. The common practice among CGEMs builders has been to impose these values, either at will or by using those stemming from other existing research. There is general consensus, however, that econometrically estimated parameters for each case study would substantially improve the robustness of results. Unfortunately, most of the so obtained elasticities are considered underestimates of both the real and theoretically expected parameters. This gave rise to a growing concern on the eventual role played by methodological and empirical issues in this matter. There are some findings that have generated a quite general consensus among researchers, related to the type of datasets used; the disaggregation levels at which goods are defined and the origins of imported varieties are considered; the frequency of data; among others.
We here argue that many of these assessments, although mostly sensible, are not at all robust, as they are based on the exhaustive comparison of values that were, however, estimated using non comparable - and even statistically misspecified - econometric models. We focus on four particular issues: the spatial/temporal character of the datasets used; temporal frequency of the data; the aggregation level chosen to define a good; and the estimation methodologies used. We critically discuss the existing surveys and the papers therein reviewed, and use Uruguayan data as a means of testing for the validity of the different hypotheses.


Resource Details (Export Citation) GTAP Keywords
Category: 2009 Conference Paper
Status: Published
By/In: Presented at the 12th Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Santiago, Chile
Date: 2008
Version:
Created: Cassoni, A. (4/15/2009)
Updated: Batta, G. (5/29/2009)
Visits: 1,651
- South America


Attachments
If you have trouble accessing any of the attachments below due to disability, please contact the authors listed above.


Public Access
  File format 2009 Conference Paper  (649.3 KB)   Replicated: 0 time(s)


Restricted Access
No documents have been attached.


Special Instructions
No instructions have been specified.


Comments (0 posted)
You must log in before entering comments.

No comments have been posted.